Yes, I do agree with you that this v2 as well as earlier v1 we're priced right. There are a lot of decks out there that people go nuts for at crazy prices that I wouldn't bother taking the time to fill out an address if they were giving them away for free. I would rather see a deck made available at a decent price in a higher quantity than an artificially induced rarity for an inflated price because someone made the conscious decision to make only 100.Īt the end of the day it all comes down to what we think its value is and what we would pay. STLBluesNut wrote:Yeah, I get that, but if you consider just the deck itself, personally, I don't think $15 is too much for what it is. if you want them for display.these aren't worth the expensive shipping or ebay prices. If you are into playing and handling your decks. If the V2's handle as good as the V1's do (plus i personally like the black version better -black is always better) then these will be just as popular. when i handled the 1st V1, they felt great. However i do magic and cardistry (very poorly i might add) so i put many deck through the ringer. I do have my fair share of beautiful 'unopened' or 'opened but never shuffled' decks that are strictly for display. not because they started selling for $50 on ebay (if i had know thought ) but because the deck itself handles amazingly.

I think that these 1st playing cards are doing so well because they are focused on function.įor the V1 release i only picked up one deck because like some other people here stated, the design wasn't super impressive.

$30 for shipping is pricey, but this is my rational. Hey guys!! i was able to get a brick plus some singles of the V2's.

1st playing cards chris ramsay v1